Wednesday, October 03, 2012

VIDCLIP: Dog Brothers Tribal Gathering Highlights

The Dog Brothers have two types of Gatherings where they test their fighting skills with stick(s), staff, knives, grappling (with and without a stick or knife) and even "exotic" weapons such as the spear, three-sectional staff, nine sectioned whip, cane, shield, sword, etc.

There is the Open Gathering in which anyone in the world can test their skills. There is also a Closed-Door session known as a  "Tribal Gathering" where only members of the Dog Brothers Tribe participate.

Below are highlights of the past three:


Dog Brothers 2010 Tribal Gathering Highlights


Tuesday, October 02, 2012

TRAINING: Benjamin "Lonely Dog" Rittiner Workouts 4-8

Check out some of Guro Benjamin Rittiner's (aka Lonely Dog of the Dog Brothers) training for Stickfighting. Here are the next four clips. 

Lonely Dog's Workout 005 - Kicking




Monday, October 01, 2012

TRAINING: Benjamin "Lonely Dog" Rittiner Workouts1-4

Check out some of Guro Benjamin Rittiner's (aka Lonely Dog of the Dog Brothers) training for Stickfighting. Here are the first four clips.

Lonely Dog's Workout 001 - Hitting the Tire



Friday, September 28, 2012

SELF-DEFENSE: Southnarc (aka Craig Douglas) - Managing Unknown Contacts


Managing Unknown Contacts
by Southnarc (aka Craig Douglas)

 
I’ve been on the road now teaching citizen self defense courses for about a year, and it’s been very educational for me. I’ve been able to improve my own course work based on student feedback and more importantly I’ve been able to prioritize the presentation of my material.

As everyone probably knows at this point I’m a fanatic about contextually underscored training. We should always be examining the problem and focus our solutions accurately.

Tactics, I’ve come to realize in the citizen self defense world are more often than not, merely paid lip service to. Most training focuses on technical development of motor skills whether that’s shooting, blade work, or empty hand skills.

So what we’re going to focus on in this tutorial are tactics, particularly pre-engagement tactics. I teach this block of instruction first in every class I do, regardless of the particulars of the skill-set, and I feel like it’s probably the most important.

Lee has already written an excellent piece on stranger confrontations, and this material is very in-line with his thread. This is just my take on the subject matter.

There have been several threads in The Codex already which cover the Criminal Assault Paradigm and it’s important that one study that material first. After all we must understand the problem, before we can discuss solutions.

SELF-DEFENSE: Southnarc (aka Craig Douglas) - The ConditioningCorollary and Victim Selection

The Conditioning Corollary and Victim Selection
by Southnarc (aka Craig Douglas)




Slowly but surely the gulf between various unarmed camps is steadily decreasing. Traditional martial artists, mixed martial artists, and so called "reality based self defense" trainers (I've come to dislike that word) are taking tentative, small steps towards each other.

One of the major issues that abounds is the role of conditioning in combative outcome. I think we all agree that it's important, but the major disagreement seems to be on how important it is.

Matt Thornton, who has taken and given back his fair share of criticism on-line, has postulated that a formative process which transforms the individual into a superior physical specimen, combined with good awareness will probably be enough to preclude the "necessity" of carrying weapons.

Now what's interesting about his thesis, is that in a self-fulfilling way he's probably right.

Thursday, September 27, 2012

SELF-DEFENSE: Southnarc (aka Craig Douglas) - Training Structure & the Criminal Assault Paradigm

Training Structure & the Criminal Assault Paradigm
by Southnarc (aka Craig Douglas)

THE SELF DEFENSE PROBLEM
 
Today, self defense and protection training is more prolific and available than ever. It seems that on every street corner there’s a school that teaches self defense and in every magazine there’s a new ad every month for the ultimate protection system.

With this market saturation how does the concerned citizen make an informed decision as to what school or instructor offers them the best and most appropriate product?

One area to pay attention to is how the training is structured. More specifically does the instructor have a grasp on, and always keep his material relevant to, the context.

If we are to seek solutions the first thing we have to do is understand the problem.

Most citizens are concerned about the problem of criminal assault and what solutions are the most appropriate for managing this issue.

So with that said, let’s look at the problem of criminal assault and more importantly how training is historically structured.

Wednesday, September 26, 2012

SELF-DEFENSE: Southnarc (aka Craig Douglas) - The Myth of Proportional Armament

The Myth of Proportional Armament
by Southnarc (aka Craig Douglas)


Usually when one takes training or instruction what they are receiving is an instructor’s vision of a confrontation and the means to prevent or manage such. A lot can be gleaned about someone’s reference points to the realities of self defense, by examining the methods they espouse. This is important from the standpoint of insuring that you are indeed training in a system that matches the realities of the way life or death struggle flows.

One of the biggest areas that I see instructors lacking is in their belief that two individuals in a confrontation will be equally armed. They may acknowledge that disparate force confrontations are common, but does their instruction reflect this? An example:

Many proponents of knife work teach a system that is predicated on maintaining range and cutting an appendage as it comes into one’s protective circle. The next thing that follows is usually a statement such as “If you can maintain range, you should since you don’t want close with his blade”. Now let’s stop right there and think about that for a moment.

What this implies is that he has a knife and you have a knife, and both of you have been able to get said knives in hand and are at range. How often does it really happen this way folks? In my experience, not very often.

Tuesday, September 25, 2012

SELF-DEFENSE: Southnarc (aka Craig Douglas) - Battle Glad and Strife Eager

 Battle Glad and Strife Eager
by Southnarc (aka Craig Douglas)


In the June 2002 issue of Soldier of Fortune magazine an article by Bill Bagwell titled "The Blade in War", was published. The piece is a historical overview of bladed combat over the ages. Bagwell begins with a look at how many casualties were inflicted in various battles over history in his treatise on the lethality of edged weapons, and moves from there into some thoughts and suppositions on the kind of men who waged primitive warfare.

It was this portion of the article that peaked my interest as Bagwell has some very insightful things to say about the generations of yore and what it took to be a warrior. What I've done is to cut out that portion of the article and let it stand alone. What follows are Bagwell's words and I think that he really hits several points home that the student of modern combatives would be wise to heed.

Monday, September 24, 2012

SELF-DEFENSE: Southnarc (aka Craig Douglas) - A "Systems" Approach to Building a Profile

“SouthNarc” is the on-line pseudonym for Craig Douglas.  He worked in a multi-agency drug unit, in the southern United States, hence "SouthNarc." He has served in Law Enforcement since 1990 and has held line assignments in corrections, patrol, narcotics, and investigations.

SouthNarc has over thirty+ years background in Phillipine, Indonesian, Brazillian and Japanese martial arts and is a veteran of the U.S. Army. He has been conducting training in the private sector in the U.S. and abroad for the past 5+ years.

IMO, he is one of the top-tier instructors teaching Self-Defense currently. With his kind permission, I'm posting some of his articles/pieces.




A "Systems" Approach to Building a Profile
by Southnarc (aka Craig Douglas)



Often in the self-defense community we hear the word "system" used to describe the eclectic education that many have accrued over a lifetime. "System" sounds less martial-artsy than "style" and I think that that's one reason that many prefer the term. System just sounds more serious.

What exactly is a System? A lexical definition of a system is "an arrangement of units that function together". Following this line of logic, we would assume that when we call the data in our profile a "system" then all of it would function together. But does it by definition or even in reality?

How often have you heard someone say "Well I do a little grappling…a little stand-up…and I incorporated some FMA for weapons work"? My question is usually "Well that sounds great but does it all work together"? The person in general is somewhat nonplussed and doesn't really know how to answer.

For what you do to truly be a system, as per Webster, your "units" have to work together, or more importantly be common. The movements to deploy tools, strike, etc. need to be as close to one another in execution as they can efficiently be. Why, and moreover why should one strive for systemization?


Friday, September 21, 2012

MENTAL EDGE: Mental Training by Xen Nova

My friend Xen Nova is training to be a MMA fighter. He was asked: "When did you know you were ready to fight?"

Below is his article-length reply lol. 

Enjoy!

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This is entirely based on your psychology and what you need to do to prepare yourself. 

You say you're former SpecOps, did you see any action? Have you been in very high stress situations before? Most people haven't so the jitters are very new to them. If you're familiar with it then you know what to expect and how to prepare. 

The thing is there is always a moment where you DON"T WANT TO BE THERE... Where you wonder "What the f@ck am I doing!", but that is the point that decides whether you're a man or a b!tch and it's hard to replicate this in the gym. 

If you bust your nose the sparring stops you call a "chill-dog" rule, go clean up, and you're fine. But in a fight, you're going to get hit pretty f@cking hard and you NEED to know if you can just mentally carry yourself through that. 

Thursday, September 20, 2012

Thoughts on "Techniques" vs "Fundamentals" and "Reading" by Joe Silvia

Techniques can only ever be the assemblage of principles. They are slaves to the fundamental principles. However, in this day and age instead of looking for the triangle point, the locking arm, power transfer, disrupting structure and posture, and reading your opponents intent and momentum, people force a technique on reality. The reality is READING....like a QB on a football line will give you the feedback and data you need to create a SPECIFIC solution to that SPECIFIC moment in time.

Wednesday, September 19, 2012

MMA: 2 Concepts for Throwing/Sweeping - "Locking Arm" and "PowerTransfer" by Joe Silvia


Exceprt from Spladdle Forum's Epic Clinch Thread:

UFC130 Frank Mir X Roy Nelson


Mir's throw was a Whizzer with a leg reap. He did not actually have two overhooks, but an overhook with elbow control.


Bear with me, as this little concept will deepen one's understanding of wrestling in specific, and grappling in general....whether standing or on the ground sweeping.

Your arms when throwing or sweeping (when on the ground) share one of two jobs. If you grasp this concept you will see that there really are only two set-ups/tie-ups for throws:

1. Locking Arm
2. Power Transfer


EVERY throw and sweep should have these and you'll notice when a throw/sweep fails, ONE of the reasons will be one of these elements is missing, as it they are FUNDAMENTALS. The other reason could be you ignoring what your opponent is doing or you aren't utilizing the triangle point. That's another thread.

One arm/hand is to LOCK and the other arm or hand is to transfer the power. It doesn't matter whether you are locking his wrist, elbow, shoulder, head, etc. It doesn't matter whether the arm transferring the power is using his wrist, elbow, shoulder, or head. They are ALL fundamentals. Of course, there is an hierarchy. A lock on a wrist won't be as secure as a lock on his shoulder (underhook) and transferring power using his wrist isn't as good as using his head (collar tie).

Whenever you are watching a throw, watch for the locking/securing and the power transfer. In the Mir GIF he has secured or locked Roy's left elbow with his torso and upper arm. He has "secured" Roy. His left arm is the power transfer and in this case he is using the whizzer. These two ARE NOT SEPARATE, but are one "entity." They are a union. A throw's chances of success are greatly lessened if one of these is missing.

The other FUNDAMENTAL aspect while you are jockeying for locking arms and power transfers is to use his momentum and draw him into HIS triangle point. You will notice Mir PERFECTLY pulls Nelson into his own triangle point. By using the leg reap/block, he does another FUNDAMENTAL: breaking an opponents structure. By having his upper body or "solar plexus" continue it's momentum, but bring Roy's "lunar plexus" or lower body to a stop, he disrupts Roy's structure.

The reason Roy didn't go heels over head is because one of Mir's fundamental's was missing: proper head position. He allowed Roy to win the battle of forehead position. It was a small sacrifice since he had the locking arm, power transfer and triangle point covered. However, if Mir had forehead position, Roy would have had his posture disrupted and went heels over head.

This little mini-seminar is what I teach people in their first week or two. I don't teach them techniques. I teach them the triangle point, locking arm and power transfer. I give them 2-3 examples of each and let them explore on their own. Within a week you will see a MASSIVE variety of throws. ONE WEEK. As opposed to hand feeding them a technique or two.








For other Roy Nelson-related posts, please check out:




Tuesday, September 18, 2012

MMA: The Clinch - Fundamentals and Drills by Joe Silvia

Excerpt from Spladdle Forum's The Epic Clinch Thread:

Introduction

I have generalized the clinch into a Fibbing Clinch & a Grappling Clinch. Generally speaking you are either holding and hitting or working for a takedown/sub. BOTH begin with the base camp philosophy....posture, facing, spacing, breathing, head position, etc. Let's merge these. With ANY tie up, you can either grapple or fibb. What do both have in common? Tie ups. So in essence, there is one clinch (tie ups).


Fundamentals

Forehead position: Notice I don't say HEAD POSITION....if you say head position, fighters will use the top of their head.

Your forehead position is CRUCIAL for defense AND offense. EVERY position has to have a congruent forehead position (or more accurately a wedge).

  • Forehead to forehead (defensive)
  • Forehead to temple
  • Forehead to under the ear (pocket)
  • Forehead to sternum
  • Forehead to ribs or stomach

Monday, September 17, 2012

MMA: Guide to the MMA Shoot by Joe Silvia


Introduction

A proper "shoot" in MMA seems to be a rare creature. I think I saw one of them on the Sci-Fi Channel's paranormal shows. :)

While I am just kidding, it does seem that the success of shooting has dropped considerably...and/or never was that high to begin with. A few of the reasons in my opinion, are that the shoot is being done by people new to wrestling and that wrestlers haven't modified the shoot for MMA. What we are seeing is people shooting that have recently learned the wrestling version or people shooting using the setups that have worked for them in Wrestling.

In addition, the separation of training into an antiquated 1 hour of Kickboxing/Muay Thai, 1 hour of Wrestling, and one hour of BJJ method, instead of stand-up, clinch and ground, is insuring that the "shoot" remains a Wrestling technique, since the setups don't involve striking. This method of training completely ignores the fundamental skillset of shooting within a striking environment. Setting it up from striking and while being struck at is a darn important skill.

Doing otherwise violates the training law of specificity. See the Spladdle's article on the training principle of specificity here.

So what is needed, is a shoot that is adapted, modified, altered to MMA. In other words, the shoot needs to evolve. It needs to be practical, and of a high enough percentage to be considered useful.

Friday, September 14, 2012

MMA: Utilizing Triangle Points when Striking by Joe Silvia

While many of you are familiar with using the triangle point in the clinch and the ground, you also can use it in the stand-up. If you have an opponent who is walking you down, if you strike his body INTO his triangle points, your punches will have slightly less power, but will have an off-balancing quality to them since you are projecting power into his break in balance. The possible outcomes of hitting into his triangle point:


  1. Stops him in his tracks momentarily. He needs to restart his momentum allowing you attack or evasion opportunities.
  2. Knocks him off-balance momentarily, and he needs to get back to base camp and renew his attack. A greater attack or evasion opportunity.
  3. Knocks him down, even if he is not hurt. This opens up a can of opportunity worms.

A way to amplify your damage is to strike AGAINST his triangle point at up to 90 degrees. This is where his balance is strongest, but it's also where he is most rooted to the ground. This means his body will absorb ALL the power being transmitted without moving. Lastly, the triangle is 3 dimensional. This is why uppercuts and knees are so damaging (or a schoolyard kick to the crotch)....because a person's head was being hit AGAINST the triangle point. Also, why we promote proper posture over being bent over. So to mix and match these with an opponent, you need your footwork. Don't just look at footwork as something you "do." It should have a purpose, a plan. One of the uses is to get an angle to strike into and against triangle points. In this GIF of James Toney vs. Roy Jones you see a fine example of punching INTO a triangle point.


Thanks to the unknown GIF maker.


In this image of Rocky Marciano vs. Jersey Joe Walcott you see a fine example of someone who was great at punching AGAINST triangle points.


Photo credit:  http://www.rockymarciano.com

If you would like to learn more principles of striking, grappling, and wrestling as it applies to MMA, inbox us or come by the next work out. The first week is FREE!

Thursday, September 13, 2012

MMA: The Jab's Role in MMA by Joe Silvia


The jab is perhaps the most important tool in boxing and in MMA, however the set-ups, function and objectives with a jab are 180 degrees different.



The distance that is just right for you depending on your height, limb length and style and not so good for "him" is called a measure. In boxing you use two limbs and two tools to attack, however in MMA you have four limbs and have eight tools to attack with so the measure is different. In the street you have a ninth, the head.


Wednesday, September 12, 2012

Added an Email Subscription Option for my Readers

Hello:


*Bows deeply*

I have been jammed with Real Life and had various computer issues, therefore, I've not posted in a timely fashion like I used to. For what it's worth, I'm getting back into the groove and hope you join me in my Sojourn in the Martial Arts, Self-Defense, and Life.

On the Sidebar to the right, you should see a widget "Subscribe by email". I figured providing this option may be better time management for you. Clicking that will bring you to a screen looking like this:








MMA: Some Stand-Up Fundamentals by Joe Silvia

My friend Joe Silvia is a MMA coach who wrote a series of articles. Joe is better known by his screenname of  "Ausgepicht" on a few Martial Arts forums. With his kind permission I will be putting his articles up on my site.

Without further ado, here is the first of his articles:  Some Stand-up Fundamentals.

I hope you find it useful in your training!





MMA is a game of inches and mistakes and never more so in the stand-up range. Because of this you MUST abide by your fundamentals. So what are some of the fundamentals when you are punching, kicking, elbowing and kneeing?


  • Stance (Posture) & Motion.
  • Base camp: centering with posture, alignment, movement, spacing, facing, etc.
  • Using a defensive motion (footwork, parry, cover, or head movement) after you are done punching.
  • ALWAYS stepping....when on offense and defense and with each strike.
  • ALWAYS moving your head and covers. Don't wait and try to time them with your opponents attack - it'll be too late.
  • Use your measure: know when to steal, leave, or gain it.
  • ALWAYS set-up your leg kicks with hands.
  • Always strike from where the tool is (Don't telegraph)
  • Power rises from the feet and waves to the hip. The hip acts like a tank turret and explosively twists. This COMPOUNDED power is then delivered to your strike and THROUGH the target. It doesn't start from the shoulders or you'll be an arm puncher. To make your strikes even more powerful, use your footwork to add your forward momentum. Also add the drop step. Time your opponent so he ADDS his momentum to the power. Lastly, strike INTO or THROUGH the triangle point. Don't let anyone tell you power is from the hips or arm muscles. Power isn't important. DAMAGE is. Use these principles to compound damage.
  • For someone who has excellent footwork or a lot of head movement, strike to where he is going or where he will be not where he is AT.
  • Throw punches in bunches.
  • Hierarchy of strikes: retroactive is when he strikes and you get hit or you successfully cover, parry or move your head THEN attack. Counteractive is when you parry or move your head AND attack at the same time. Pro-active is when you attack his preparation to attack you. As you gain more experience, awareness and skill you'll be able to use the last one more and more.
  • Fake shoots often. Keep him worried about throwing his hands.
  • Observe his ignorance of fundamentals and what he does wrong. People establish these in patterns and habits. Bringing a punch back slow and/or not back to guard. Throwing a right hand over your jab EVERY time. Kicking without setting it up. Standing still. Throwing "ones." When he establishes a pattern, make him pay for it.
  • One of the best times to strike is during transitions. After a failed shoot, after you break out of a clinch, or when he is in between beats in a combination. Use the Duck & Chuck or Bendo & Hendo for those guys who are avoiding your shoot or clinch.
  • If you throw a combo on someone they will attack right after. So one of the best times to shoot or get to the clinch is when you throw you last punch. You know he is going to throw a combo right after. To do that he has to plant his feet. Just what you want. This is called "Sticking the 'Possum."
  • ALWAYS step laterally after one step backward. You can't move backward faster than he can move forward so don't move backwards more than one step.
  • In mismatched leads, you want your foot outside your opponents and you want to jab with your back hand.
  • If he is reluctant to strike, or is a potshotter, or is super aggressive attack his limbs, nerve bundles and muscle bellies.
  • If he is a counter puncher, draw his counter with fakes and feints.
  • A tank or slow, powerful fighter can be beat by using speedy footwork and strikes. A faster opponent can be beat using timing.
  • ALWAYS break the rhythm and pattern of your footwork, combinations, and vary your attack. Establishing a pattern gives him the information he needs to successfully hurt you.
  • The jab is one of the best tools in boxing. However, in MMA you must be careful. The range or measure is different. Make sure you are NOT in long range when you use it, but in middle to close range. Closer the better.
  • Off-balance your opponent that is walking you down by hitting into his triangle point.
  • Be deceptive. Always hide your intentions.
These are SOME of the fundamental tactics. Don't worry about the information getting "out there" since it's the training method that makes these fundamentals autonomous that matters. Besides this is the tip of the proverbial iceberg.

Notice everything is mentioned in a positive manner. The worst thing a coach can do is tell you a bunch of "nevers" and "don'ts." That puts you into a state "OK, I shouldn't do that.....now what am I supposed to do." It adds an EXTRA step in the thought process and if it's in a match or sparring, while you are thinking you will be looking up at the ceiling. A good coach will remind you what to do, not what not to do.

Saturday, September 08, 2012

IN MEMORY OF: Joe Lewis (March 7, 1944 – August 31, 2012)

Source pic:  Kenpocomics.com


Joe Lewis, a legend in the Martial Arts, passed away 8/31/12.


From Wiki :

In July 2011, he was diagnosed with a malignant brain tumor. Doctors told him that if he did nothing, he’d have six to eight weeks to live. On July 18, surgeons removed the tumor. “He had the best doctors, and they think they did a good job of getting it all out,” said Dennis Nackord, Lewis’ senior black belt.

Lewis died one year and forty-five days later, on the morning of August 31, 2012.

Voted as the greatest karate fighter all-time, he was a student of Bruce Lee's briefly. Truly a legend.


My sincerest condolences to his family, friends, and students. May he and Bruce be united and discussing the martial arts.




Here are some highlights from his fights:






And here is his fight vs Bill "Superfoot" Wallace, both in their 40's:











And his fight vs Chuck Norris:





For further info:

     

Wednesday, August 29, 2012

BOXING: The Wisdom of Mike Gibbons.

My deepest thanks to marbleheadmaui of http://www.saddoboxing.com for posting this.




Mike Gibbons was the older and smaller of the legendary Gibbons Brothers. Mike was mostly a middle and fought around the WWI years. How good was he? How about 110+ wins against a dozen losses and he was never knocked out. How good was the competition? Mike went 4-2 against HOFers including a win over a young Harry Greb. In other words Mike Gibbons was the real deal.

He published several books on training and boxing technique the following is taken from his How to Box published in 1925. The book is seventy five pages of instruction with extraordinary demonstration photos showing the Gibbons Brothers using model technique. The book covers every element of the sport and I am going to focus on his commentary on "Ring Generalship." As always the ideas are Gibbons with any comments I might have in parenthesis.

BOXING: The Wisdom of Charley Goldman.

My deepest thanks to marbleheadmaui of http://www.saddoboxing.com for posting this.



Charley Goldman was a pre-WWI bantamweight. He stood 5'1. He had over 130 fights and was by most accounts a competent journeyman though he did get a shot at the bantam crown on one occasion. Goldman retired at 29 due to among other things, terribly brittle hands.

But Goldman is far better known as the trainer of a series of undisputed champions. Middleweight Al McCoy, featherweight Joey Archibald and lightweight king Lou Ambers. Goldman is most well known as the man who shaped Rocky Marciano. In 1957 Goldman, Marciano and a manager, judo expert and writer named Al Bachman published a how to book. The book is just under 200m pages and loaded with insights on every element of the sport. It is clearly designed for the young man just taking up the game and is titled Rocky Marciano's Boy's Book of Boxing and Body Building.

BOXING: The Wisdom of Jack Dempsey.

My deepest thanks to marbleheadmaui of http://www.saddoboxing.com for posting this.



The Jimmy Wilde and Barney Ross books I summarized recently were both useful and insightful. But Jack Dempsey's "Championship Fighting: Explosive Punching and Aggressive Defense" is on another level entirely. It is far longer and absolutely full of insights, thoughtful approaches, sketches and explanations. It is a boxing tour de force. I was very surprised by two things. First, I think of Dempsey as a kind of raw offensive machine. It simply ain't true. The knowledge he imparts here is comprehensive. Secondly, Dempsey and his editor Jack Cuddy make it sounds like Dempsey is actually teaching the reader. Concise declarative sentences. Written in 1950.

BOXING: The Wisdom of Barney Ross.

Photo credit:  Wiki


The greatest Jewish fighter of all time, the second man to be an undisputed three division champion and one of THE fascinating lives ever lived. Father killed in a robbery, worked for Al Capone, degenerate gambler, after he retired he joined the Marines and was a decorated hero on Guadalcanal and later ran guns to Israel. Shortly after he retired he published "The Fundamentals of Boxing." I'll stick to the high points. Except for the parenthetical, the thoughts are those of Barney Ross. This book is more complete and in depth than Wilde's so I am going to stick to major points and boxing tactics.



"Only a small part of a champion's greatness lies in his ability. Far more important is his eagerness to learn, his flair for adding finesse and polish to his style. Most important of all is his love of the game. Every great champion was once a beginner. Without this essential love for the sport, he would always have remained a beginner."




General
  • The transition from defense to offense is where fights are won. Surprise is a major weapon.
  • All punches should land with a corkscrew motion to maximize power
  • Ross disagrees with Wilde in that he believes the uppercut can be a valuable punch but that it is dangerous if not thrown correctly
  • Jumping or hopping is poor technique as one cannot counter, sidestepping is far better as is the pivot.
  • In footwork, less is more. Move the minimal distance necessary to accomplish the goal. Save the legs.
  • Unorthodox fighters like Tony Canzoneri (the 1930's Roy Jones) should not be imitated
  • A weary fighter is more easily KO'd and KO's are a matter of timing and accuracy more than simple power.




Defense
  • Often the best way to begin countering is to take a single short step backward (See Salvador Sanchez or Joe Louis)
  • "A good defensive fighters learns to judge instinctively how hard his foe can punch and where he punches most effectively" (Floyd Mayweather anyone?)
  • Clinching is a skill that must be acquired to be a good defensive fighter
  • The "sliding roll" is taking a short step backward to avoid a punch while at the same time dropping the head underneath the coming punch. Now one is in perfect position to counter (as Mr. Miyagi taught "Best block is no be there.")
  • Parrying blows to the inside is preferable to taking punches on the gloves or forearms
  • Like Wilde, Ross emphasizes the importance of "swaying at the hips." (Think Sweet Pea)
  • Methods of avoiding the jab/hook are slipping, swaying, ducking ( a dangerous method) parrying (four possible directions), sidestepping and the simplest, catching it. (How many guys know these?)
  • The left to the body is best blocked rather than jumped back or sidestepped.
  • A straight right can be parried by the right hand or blocked by hunching the left shoulder (BHOP or James Toney) though a sidestep or a slip can leave one in a better position to counter.
  • No rules for stopping the uppercut. Various blocks or the sway are possible




Counterpunching
  • "With a counter you accumulate the power of your own body and the power of the opponent...as he comes to you."
  • Sidestepping is generally preferable to ducking as a set up.
  • The trick is to catch the foe off balance and coming to you
  • To counter a straight right, side step and throw a very short left hook. If it misses throw up your arms to block the next right hand.
  • Each counter should be a lesson learned. If the foe blocked the hook to the head? Next time counter to the ribcage.
  • The exact counterpunch chosen depends upon the method of defense used to avoid the initial punch. In other words a sway will lead to a different counter than a slip or a duck etc.
  • Quickness is critical in countering
  • Perhaps the most effective countering situation is stepping inside a left hook and delivering a short right to the jaw (Joe Louis anyone?)
  • When a fighter tires the right cross often disappears.




Offensive Strategy
  • "Greatest offensive weapon is a keen mind."
  • One must learn to feint to camouflage one's punches
  • Feints employ every part of the body, the eys, half punches, false steps, rolling a shoulder etc.
  • "Drawing an opponent's lead" is critical. This means showing phony openings so he'll throw the punch you want him to throw (Juan Manuel Marquez wrecked The Baby Bull this way)
  • Of course clever fighters know you are doing this, so be careful
  • Keep on the move, but stay balanced and prepared to hit.




Bodypunching and Infighting
  • Particularly effective against tall fighters
  • The liver, kidney's (then a legal punch) and solar plexus are best spots
  • To get inside foes punches, crouch, try to draw a jab, step inside and crowd him and try to get your head to the opponents left shoulder and let go with short, snappy punches and keep him there until you are done. (That's the way Henry Armstrong retired Barney)
  • When on offensive keep elbows close to hips to stop counters.
  • If on defense, sidestep and jab, if that doesn't work, close guard and throw uppercuts or clinch




Training
  • Three goals-Bring vitality to highest pitch, increase skill and perfect knowledge of strategy (what I call craft)
  • A training schedule must be kept with clocklike perfection.
  • As a general rule a fighter should spend approximately five minutes with the medicine ball and light weights, an hour on calisthenics and 30 minutes each on the heavy bag/speed bag/double end bag, jumping rope, sparring and shadow boxing (that's 3+ hours daily in addition to running)
  • Keep mouth closed while breathing
  • Sparring should be full speed. Anything less is too far away from an actual fight to be of use.
  • Sparring should be done with specific goals regarding specific situations
  • Eat sparingly, Ross typically ate twice a day with proteins, whole grains and vegetables




Here is how Barney Ross closes his book:

Only a small part of a champion's greatness lies in his ability. Far more important is his eagerness to learn, his flair for adding finesse and polish to his style. Most important of all is his love of the game. Every great champion was once a beginner. Without this essential love for the sport, he would always remain a beginner.




For more information, please check out:






For Barney Ross-related entries, please see:





NOTE:  My deepest thanks to marbleheadmaui for posting this distillation from Barney Ross out-of-print book and to Douglas Century, biographer of Barney Ross, for the quote.

BOXING: The Wisdom of Jimmy Wilde.

My deepest thanks to marbleheadmaui of http://www.saddoboxing.com for posting this.



I have been fortunate enough to find a wonderful source for old time boxing books. Mr. Clay Moyle. Moyle is best known for his recent biography of Sam Langford (which I recommend). From time to time I will provide book reports of sorts.

The first is a short 1927 book by the immortal Jimmy Wilde entitled The Art of Boxing. For those unfamiliar with Wilde he is basically the man the flyweight division was created for. A Welshman, Wilde is p4p one of the top ten punchers in history. He was tiny at 5'2 and for much of his career he fought at under 100 pounds. He usually weighed in fully clothed including his shoes and spent his whole career outweighed by 10-20 pounds. Yet somehow he knocked out over 100 men. While fighting in the US he often was forced to put on weight in order to fight legally as many states had laws limiting weight differentials. Catchweights indeed! Gene Tunney called Wilde the finest fighter he ever saw. Here are some of the points he makes in his book I found interesting. All of the below (with the obvious exceptions) are the thoughts of Jimmy Wilde:

Tuesday, August 21, 2012

QUOTES: Bruce Lee - "To be rid of ego-consciousness."



To be rid of ego-consciousness. - Because one's self-consciousness or ego-consciousness is too conspicuously present over the entire range of his attention - which fact interferes with a free display of whatever proficiency he has so far acquired or is going to acquire. One should get rid of this obtruding self - or ego-consciousness - and apply himself to the work to be done as if nothing particular were taking place at the moment.


Striking Thoughts
Bruce Lee's Wisdom for Daily Living
by Bruce Lee
edited by John Little
pg 55

Yamaoka Tesshu's Shoe "Tell"




Tesshu would tell his disciples, "When someone comes to the dojo for a challenge match, take a look at the bottom of his wooden sandals in the entrance hall while he is changing clothes in the hall. If the teeth on the bottom of the sandals are not worn evenly, you can be sure he is often off balance and not much of a swordsman."


Budo Secrets - Teachings of the Martial Arts Masters
By John Stevens
pg 102


QUOTES: Issai Chozanshi - "Secret things are for the sake of beginners."


Have you ever wondered why there are "secrets" in the Martial Arts? Wonder no more!

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Yet another in the group asked, "Swordsmanship is the mysterious function of the mind. Why then are there secret techniques?"

QUOTES: Frank Shamrock - "The ego is garbage."


Frank Shamrock on Ego



"Ego is an evil thing. Confidence is important,  but ego is something false. Humility is the way to build confidence, and ego is hugely dangerous in this sport, because if you're running on ego you aren't running on good clean emotions, or cause and effect. You bypass it to support a false idea. It's all garbage, the ego is garbage."


The Fighter's Mind
By Sam Sheridan
pg 175

Unprofessional Sucker Punch from NYC Bouncer against a drunk

Once they left the bar, the bouncers shouldn't have come out... there is the danger of the head splitting open on the concrete! Very unprofessional bouncer (not like I'm a professional bouncer).
 

 
 
 

Sunday, August 19, 2012

David Black Mastro - George Silver & The London Masters of Defence - Native 16th/17th century English Fighting Arts


George Silver & The London Masters of Defence - Native 16th/17th century English Fighting Arts

By David Black Mastro


The English of the 16th and 17th centuries had an especially rich martial tradition, focusing on weapons like the "short sword" (actually a basket-hilted broadsword/backsword with a rather long 37"- 40" blade), the "short staff" (aka quarterstaff - not particularly "short" either, being 8’-9’ of ash), and the dreaded "Welsh hook" (aka "forest bill" - a type of bill with a rather light head). English fighting men proved their skill - and the effectiveness of their methods - on numerous occasions against foreign swordsmen, with such obvious examples as:

1. Austin Bagger, who used his sword-and-buckler to defeat Rocco Bonetti, who was armed with a two-handed sword during their encounter. Bagger certainly roughed up Bonetti, but let him live.

2. The mysterious Englishman known only as "Cheese", who pitted his sword-and-dagger against the rapier-and-poinard of Jeronimo (who was Vincentio Saviolo’s assistant at their rapier school in London). "Cheese" killed Jeronimo.

3. The English sailor Richard Peeke, who was shipwrecked in Spain in the early 17th century. Before the Duke of Medina Sidonia, Peeke used a quarterstaff to defeat three Spanish rapier-and-dagger men who attack him at the same time. Peeke killed one of his opponents outright, and disabled the other two.


David Black Mastro - The Spear in Chinese Martial Culture



The Spear in Chinese Martial Culture

By David Black Mastro (aka TrueFightScholar)



The spear has played a huge role in both hunting and fighting arts all over the world, and China, with her vast martial heritage, is no exception. In his excellent article, "The Spear: An Effective Weapon Since Antiquity", author Robert H. Dohrenwend, Ph.D., noted, "The most important weapons in the Chinese military were the bow and arrow and the spear (qiang), and there were specialized bodies of soldiers trained to use each weapon." In our modern age, where so much attention has been given to the more fantastic aspects of the Chinese martial arts, we would do well to remember Dohrenwend's observation. Chinese warriors relied on the fundamental missile and melee weapons of the time, just like everyone else: the bow & arrow, the spear/lance, and the sword & shield.

Another crucial aspect to understanding the reality of Chinese martial arts (or any other martial arts, for that matter) in their proper historical context is knowing just what the term "martial art" means. The word "martial" comes from the Latin term martialis, which literally means "of or belonging to Mars (the Roman god of war)". Thus, a "martial art" is a "war art". The Chinese term wushu is synonymous with "martial art", though when used in the historical sense it should not be confused with the "wushu" of today, which is a type of performance art that was developed during the Cultural Revolution. In their useful text, Chinese Martial Arts Training Manuals--A Historical Survey, Brian Kennedy and Elizabeth Guo soberly noted, "For most of China's history, martial arts had one purpose--imposing one's will upon another by force or fear." The simple spear played a major part in this grim task.

According to Robert Dohrenwend, bronze metallurgy originated in the Mediterranean some 5000 years ago, and spread eastwards via Central Asia, and eventually to China. These early bronze-headed spears were effective, but the spear became even more durable and lethal, with the advent of iron working. Dohrenwend wrote that iron metallurgy began with the Hittites some 3500 years ago, and spread around the world from there. Such technology reached China about 2500 years ago.

Unlike the Japanese yari, the qiang of the Chinese most often featured a socketed spearhead, like Central Asian, Middle Eastern, and European spears. While the Japanese preferred their white oak for the shaft of their yari and a composite oaked-cored & bamboo laminated shaft for their nagae-yari (long spear/pike), the Chinese apparently used white wax wood, which is a species of ash. Europeans also generally preferred ash for their polearms, as it is lighter, stronger, and more flexible than oak.

Chinese military practice resembled that of Europe to some degree, in that spearmen often operated in cooperation with troops armed with sword-and-shield, and gave each other mutual support. In the West, this integration of spearmen and swordsmen arguably reached its height with the Spanish colunela (lit., "little column"), which featured pikemen, arquebusiers, and rodeleros aka targetiers (sword-and-shield men), in a ratio of 2:2:1. The pikemen were useful against both cavalry and other pikemen, while the swordsmen provided close support. In the Chinese military, the preferred weapons of the sword-and-shield troops were the single-handed saber (dao) and the round rattan shield (tengpai). At around 29" in diameter, the tengpai was similar in size to European targets (or targes). The saber type used most often was the willow leaf saber or liuyedao, which featured a single-handed grip, a disc-like handguard, and a slightly curved single-edged blade of uniform width. It was a light and handy weapon.

The integration of the spear and sword was manifest in the celebrated "Mandarin Duck Squad" unit/formation, created by the great Ming general, Qi Jiguang. During the mid-16th century AD/CE, the southern Chinese coast was ravaged by Sino-Japanese pirates (wokou in Chinese and wako in Japanese). In Late Imperial Chinese Armies 1520-1840, Chris Peers pointed out that, at that time, the manpower of the wokou was 2/3 Chinese--however, even some of their Chinese warriors used very long Japanese swords (no-dachi, which led to the reintroduction of two-handed dao into the Chinese military) and the corresponding method of kenjutsu. In General Qi's "Mandarin Duck Squad", four men were equipped with long spears, which outranged the no-dachi of the enemy, but they were nevertheless supported by two sword-and-shield men.

The overall impact of the spear on Chinese martial culture can be seen in the legend regarding the origins of the internal art of Xingyiquan; according to the legend, Xingyi was created by General Yue Fei, sometime during the Southern Song Dynasty (1127-1279 A.D./C.E.). According to Kennedy and Guo in Chinese Martial Arts Training Manuals, Yue Fei based Xingyi "on his mastery of the spear". Even if we question the reality of this story, it reveals much about how highly regarded the spear was, as a weapon.

Chinese spear technique was similiar to that of other cultures, and one of the most noteworthy tactics is the dreaded "slip-thrust", where the weapon is driven by the rear hand, as the shaft slides through the forward hand. As noted in my previous essay on Japanese spears, the "slip-thrust" gives the spearman a tremendous advantage against users of shorter weapons like swords, since it is so difficult to properly gauge distance.

The spear continued to be a primary weapon, into more modern times. In Comprehensive Asian Fighting Arts, Draeger and Smith pointed out that, during the Opium Wars, the British acknowledged that the Chinese spear was "far superior" to their bayonets. This should not surprise us--the spear is a purpose-built polearm that is comparatively light and maneuverable, whereas the rifle-and-bayonet is, at best, an improvised polearm that is both shorter and clumsier than the vast majority of spears. The Chinese predilection for spears and sabers might be one reason why American and European military forces retained not only bayonet work, but saber & cutlass drill as well, right into the beginning of the 20th century. One can see old photos of cutlass practice on board American vessels like the armored monitor, U.S.S. Monadnock, which was often stationed in China, and cutlass practice was also carried out on the Australian monitor Cerberus, which was involved in the supression of the Boxer Rebellion in 1900. The retention of bayonet and sword technique in these modern Western militaries was quite likely a functional reaction to unpleasant experiences against Asian foes armed with traditional edged weapons, like the Chinese, the Filipinos, the Moros, etc., and it reveals much about the respect that modern soldiers had, for such warriors and their skills.



For Further Reading:


Comprehensive Asian Fighting Arts by Donn F. Draeger and Robert W. Smith

Chinese Martial Arts Training Manuals--A Historical Survey by Brian Kennedy and Elizabeth Guo

Chinese Swordsmanship--The Yang Family Taiji Jian Tradition by Scott M. Rodell

Ancient Chinese Weapons--A Martial Artist's Guide by Dr. Yang, Jwing-Ming

"The Spear--An Effective Weapon Since Antiquity" by Robert E. Dohrenwend (from the Volume 16 ~ Number 1 ~ 2007 issue of Journal of Asian Martial Arts)

Late Imperial Chinese Armies 1520-1840 by Chris Peers (Osprey Men-At-Arms series)

Warriors of the Steppe--A Military History of Central Asia, 500 B.C. to 1700 A.D. by Erik Hildinger

Pavia 1525 by Angus Konstam (Osprey Campaign series)

A History of the Art of War in the Sixteenth Century by Sir Charles Oman

David Black Mastro - The spear in Japanese martial culture

David Black Mastro - The spear in Japanese martial culture

The spear in Japanese martial culture

By David Black Mastro (aka TrueFightScholar)


In various martial cultures around the world, the sword is held in the utmost esteem--it is a weapon that has transcended its original role as a tool of war, and it is thus also seen as a symbol of power, justice, and so on. As the great European swordsman Sir Richard Francis Burton once wrote, "The history of the sword is the history of humanity".

That being said, the aura of romance surrounding the sword has done much to cloud the fact that there are, in fact, many weapons which are more formidable than the vaunted sword. Among the numerous hand weapons which fighting men have developed over the centuries, the simple spear is perhaps the greatest, and most misunderstood.

The Japanese have always had a very strong martial culture, and they did not ignore the development of the spear. Early Japanese spears were of the hoko type, made with a metal socket which the wooden shaft fitted in--much like Continental Asian and European spears. According to Donn F. Draeger in his classic text Comprehensive Asian Fighting Arts, the hoko remained in use from c. 200 B.C./B.C.E., to the late Heian or early Kamakura period (c. late 12th century A.D./C.E.). Then, the Japanese developed their distinctive yari, which featured a spearhead with a very long tang, that was fitted into a hollow-out portion in the shaft of the weapon.

From a purely combative sense, the great advantage of the spear was obviously its superior reach. For a swordsman, facing a spearman is a daunting prospect. Draeger's protege, Hunter B. Armstrong, commented on this in his excellent article, "Owari Kan Ryu Sojutsu--Classical Japanese Spear Arts", which appeared in the February 1998 issue of Exotic Martial Arts Around the World. Armstrong correctly noted that "it was the spear that dominated the battlefield," and, "In a one-on-one combat between a spearman and swordsman, the sword had little chance."

Other martial cultures have noted this truism. In his Paradoxes of Defence from 1599, the great English swordsman George Silver wrote that, "The short staff (quarterstaff) or half pike (spear) have the vantage against the... two hand sword, the sword and target (round shield), and are too hard for two swords and daggers..." In other words, a spearman could safely engage and defeat two men armed with sword-and-dagger, facing him at once!

The great difficulty for the swordsman in facing a spearman lies in the fact that the spearman can make what are generally referred to today as "slip-thrusts"--i.e., a thrust delivered with the rear hand, where the shaft of the spear slides through the loose grip of the forward hand (similar to using a pool stick). The use of slip-thrusts makes it extremely difficult for the swordsman to judge the ma-ai (combative engagement distance, what Western swordsmen refer to as "fencing measure"). The spearman can thus make feints high and low, to the outside and inside lines, and is himself safe from counters, since the swordsman cannot immediately reach him.

The Japanese took the slip-thrust concept & technique to its most extreme, by sometimes making use of a small metal tube (kuda), which fits around the spear shaft, and is held by the forward hand of the spearman. With the kuda, the slip-thrusts can be made with even greater speed, due to the reduced friction. Kan Ryu sojutsu--which makes use of a yari nearly 12 feet long--features the use of the kuda.

Another advantage of the yari--one not featured on all spears around the world--is the fact that it also has functional cutting edges. Yari heads are typically of a stout triangular cross-section, and have two edges. The spearman can therefore make sweeping cuts to various parts of the opponent's body, in addition to thrusts.

Yari were available with a variety of spearheads. In addition to the conventional head described above, there were some yari that featured a crossbar called a hadome at the base of the head (similar to the crossbar or toggle seen on European boar spears), which could be used for parrying and trapping. In addition, there were yari with more elaborate heads, like the magari-yari (also known as the jumonji yari), which side blades more or less perpendicular to the main blade. These side blades apparently could function like the hadome, but they were also sharpened, giving the spearman more cutting options.

During the 16th century, when the Portuguese arquebus (a type of matchlock musket) entered the Japanese arsenal, the nagae-yari or long spear was developed, which, at some 16 feet or more in length, was akin to the European pike. The nagae-yari was used by the ashigaru (lit., "light feet"), the footsoldiers of peasant stock who served as pikemen and arquebusiers. These organized infantrymen represented a Japanese parallel to the rank-and-file Swiss reislaufer and German landsknechts--low-born footsoldiers who could use the reach of the pike and the even greater reach of the arquebus, to down their social betters (the samurai and knights, respectively).

A weapon as devastating as the yari was naturally bound to produce its share of legendary users. Author Anthony Bryant, in his Osprey book, Samurai 1550-1600, noted the great Watanabe Hanzo, who was one of Tokugawa Ieyasu's retainers. He was so skilled in spear-fighting that he ultimately gained the nickname "Yari no Hanzo" (lit., "Hanzo of the Spear"). Another famous spearman was Kato Kiyomasa, one of the commanders in Hideyoshi's army that invaded Korea in 1592. During lulls in the fighting, Kiyomasa was known to hunt tigers, using only a spear. This was yet another example of professional fighting men hunting and/or fighting big, dangerous game using spears, as an adjunct to their military training. Northern Europeans often hunted wild boar with spears, and Spanish knights engaged in bullfighting with swords and lances. While such practices may seem repugnant to the modern mind, they nevertheless require substantial skill, and a great deal of nerve.

Even after the demise of the Feudal bushi in the mid-19th century A.D./C.E., spear technique did not die. Just as European pike and half-pike technique survived in the use of the bayonet, so did Japanese sojutsu contribute to juken-jutsu. And so the spear--one of Man's earliest weapons--tenaciously refuses to be forgotten. Though it lacks the popular mystique of the sword, its sheer effectiveness and practicality cannot be denied.


For further reading:

Comprehensive Asian Fighting Arts by Donn F. Draeger and Robert W. Smith

Classical Bujutsu--The Martial Arts and Ways of Japan Vol. One by Donn F. Draeger

Samurai 1550-1600 by Anthony Bryant (Osprey Warrior Series 7)

Samurai Warfare by Dr. Stephen Turnbull

Samurai--The weapons and spirit of the Japanese warrior by Clive Sinclair

"Owari Kan Ryu Sojutsu--Classical Japanese Spear Arts", by Hunter B. Armstrong (from the February 1998 issue of Exotic Martial Arts Around the World)

Paradoxes of Defence by George Silver

The Book of the Sword by Richard F. Burton

David Black Mastro - The Spear in Chinese Martial Culture

David Black Mastro - The dreaded Roman gladius: the sword that conquered the world


The dreaded Roman gladius: the sword that conquered the world
By David Black Mastro (aka TrueFightScholar)

According to Roman Army expert Peter Connolly in the book "Swords and Hilt Weapons", the gladius Hispaniensis (lit., "Spanish sword") was adopted by the Romans sometime during the First Punic War, when they saw this weapon being used to great effect by Iberian mercenaries in the Carthaginian Army. The Ancient Iberians were among the greatest iron workers & swordsmen of their day, and their genius in edged weapons design is thoroughly manifest in the gladius Hispaniensis -- one of the finest swords ever developed anywhere in the world.

The gladius Hispaniensis had a broad, double-edged blade around 50 cm long. The blade was broad at the base, slightly waisted in the middle, and then swelled at the center of percussion (COP). The point was long and very acute. This brilliant design made the "Spanish sword" brutally effective for both thrusting and cutting -- something that is all-too-often ignored by modern writers, who uncritically typify the gladius Hispanensis as a purely thrusting weapon. Although it was a short sword, the broad blade and swelling at the COP enabled the wielder of this weapon to easily sever limbs. The Ancient author Livy mentioned how the gladius’s chopping power lowered the morale of the Macedonian Army during the Second Macedonian War.

Tuesday, July 24, 2012

SEMINAR: Roan Jucao Carniero - Special BJJ/MMA seminar - July 27 - July 28, 2012 (Sat - Sun)

A heads-up anyone interested in a great opportunity to learn from a Carlson Gracie Black Belt. Also he's one of the trainers of Junior dos Santos and Antonio "Big Foot" Silva.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Roan Jucao Carniero will teach a special MMA seminar on Friday, July 27th from 6pm-8pm and Saturday, July 28th from 3pm-6pm at:

Ultimate Gym
5 West 30th Street 4th Floor
Manhattan
212 725-4666
http://www.ultimategymny.com


The cost is a very reasonable $50 for the two days or $25 for each single day.


Bio for Roan:

Roan Jucao Carneiro (born June 2, 1978) is a Brazilian Jiu Jitsu and Mixed Martial Arts Fighter. He started to train in July 1990 with Luiz Carlos Mateus (Manimal) 3 years later he moved to the Carlson Gracie Academy. In February 2, 2002 Carlson Gracie promoted him to a Black Belt. There he trained with the best black belts in BJJ history. Guys like Murilo Bustamente, Mario Sperry, Carlos Barreto, Vitor Belfort,Ricardo Arona,Paulo Filho,Nogueira Bros and many others. 

He competed in many BJJ tournaments and became PanAmerican Champion, Rio de Janeiro state champion and two time National Champion. Also many Grappling tournaments Copa Cyclone, BOPE , first place in Summer No Gi tournament and first place in ADCC Trials.

In 2000 he turned pro in Mixed Martial Arts and joined the Brazilian Top Team. Back then they had one the best teams in the world.  Many including Rodrigo Nogueira, Rogerio Nogueira, Milton Vieira were part of that team.

At the same time he ran a BJJ Program for orphaned kids and children in Rio de Janeiro located in the Chapeu Mangueira community. There he used to teach poor children from 5 to 16 years old.

In 2004 he moved to Paris, France for 2 years. There he helped grow the BJJ community and had many students in his academy. During this 2 years his gym got first place in the French Championship BJJ and many others tournaments.

In 2007 he moved to United States and joined the American Top Team and started fighting in the best MMA event in the world UFC.  He Fought 5 times, faced top level fighters such as John Fitch, Rich Clementi,Tony de Souza, Kevin Burns and Ryo Chonan.

Recently he ran the American Top Team Atlanta and made a lot champions, guys like Kendrick Miree, the Bellator Champion Douglas "The Phenom'' Lima. He still trains UFC heavyweight champion Junior dos Santos and Antonio "Big Foot" Silva.

Friday, July 20, 2012

39 Years ago today...

Bruce Lee
(November 27, 1940 - July 20, 1973)

Whipped up 2 gif's earlier and didn't have a chance to post. Made 2 tonight additionally in memory of Bruce Lee. Enjoy!




The Golden Dragon Movement #4:  Little Dragon Seeks the Path (aka Dragon Seeks Path)


Big Dragon Shakes Its Tail (aka Dragon Whips Its Tail)

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 






Friday, July 13, 2012

IN MEMORY OF: Jesse Glover (October 15, 1935 – June 27, 2012)

Been jammed with Real Life. Belated postings of the passings of 2 original Bruce Lee students.   


A friend forwarded me this:


With care and affection we announce:

Jesse R. Glover Passed away Wednesday June 27th.

The funeral for Jesse will take place on Saturday, July 14th at 11:00am at the Lakeview Cemetery in Seattle, WA. He will be laid to his rest beside his close friend Ed Hart and very near his friend and teacher Bruce Lee.

Jesse touched the lives of his Students and Friends in profound ways around the world, in celebration of this, Jesse’s Family has Invited everyone who would like to attend.

All are welcome.

A gathering to share memories of Jesse’s life and the profound impact he made on others will take place after the Funeral for those who would like to attend.

The address is:

Lakeview Cemetery
1554 15th Ave E
Seattle, WA 98111

Thanks to all,

Tom DeFelise for the Non Classical Gung Fu Family 




Here are some clips of Glover sifu:











For more info, check out these links:






My belated condolences to the family, friends, and students of Glover sifu.


ShareThis

 
back to top
Stickgrappler's Sojourn of Septillion Steps