Showing posts with label James W. DeMile. Show all posts
Showing posts with label James W. DeMile. Show all posts

Saturday, September 05, 2020

Seeing Deeply Part 2 by Stickgrappler




This is my followup to yesterday's entry "Seeing Deeply - the Method and Intangibles" by my friend Badger Johnson.



3 months ago I had shared Badger's essay on his thoughts on How Bruce Lee Trained His Quick Kill to a Facebook group. Badger was "seeing deeply" by connecting the dots and reading between the lines from various sources. He came up with, in my opinion, a convincing hypothesis on how Bruce Lee trained his quick kill.

A member from a Facebook group I posted that essay to commented that Bruce Lee did not teach a quick kill method. He asked me for evidence in Lee's writings. I replied that Lee in fact did not divulge his method publicly and acknowledged that Lee didn't have it in the published writings. However, if one analyzed some facts, put two and two together, one would arrive at the same conclusion as Badger did. Basically if one were to see deeply into Bruce Lee's persona and training methods, one would discover the quick kill method. This member in effect responded with "Aha! I knew it." He wrote that we were making stuff up about the legend. I pointed out that some of the sources that led Badger to his hypothesis included 2 of Bruce Lee's students, namely Dan Inosanto and an early student, James DeMile. Inosanto had mentioned Bruce's quick temper as well as NOT teaching his students certain techniques e.g. the double pak sao. DeMile is a clinical hypnotist and mentioned that he taught Lee self-hypnosis. It would not be a reach for Badger to conclude that Lee would NOT teach his quick kill method and keep it on the downlow. I asked that group member if he knew who Dan Inosanto and James DeMile were. He was done with me having either blocked me or turned off his critical mind after "winning his argument". He did not discuss it further with me.

I was a bit amazed at this member's reaction. He only accepted what Bruce Lee wrote. He did not see deeply. He did not dig deeper. In my opinion, had he delved further with secondary sources and kept an open mind, he should've come to the same hypothesis as Badger did. However, as Badger points out, some people may not know HOW to see deeply. This member's reaction to my post was a case in point. I do not know if this member had a case of idol worship and it affected his thoughts or what. Badger is one of the biggest Bruce Lee fanboys I know. And through his research he came to the realization that Bruce Lee had insecurities, was hot-headed at times, and was secretive shattering his image of Bruce Lee. After all, Lee was human like the rest of us with our temper, insecurities, etc.

I mentioned above that some people may not know HOW to see deeply. Badger mentioned a few ways in his essay.

Here are 8 ways that helps me to see deeply:


  1. If you can perform a technique with your Dominant side, can you perform it with your Complementary side?
  2. If you can perform a technique while advancing, can you perform it while retreating or sidestepping?
  3. If you can perform a technique fast, can you perform it slowly?
  4. If you can perform a technique while standing, can you perform it while flat on the ground? Squatting? One-legged?
  5. If you can perform a technique in a linear fashion, can you perform it in a circular way?
  6. Research other sources. With the added insight of the other sources, one may be able to see beyond the surface. The other sources may present the material differently than your initial source and help you open your mind to possibilities. For example:  the Facebook group member above only learned from his primary source and should he have checked out secondary sources, in this case, direct students of Bruce Lee's, he would've expanded his knowledge.
  7. Research the time period. Sometimes the circumstances in the time period gives clues on why things were done the way they were done. Now apply that to your current situation. For example:  While Okinawa was under Japanese rule, the Okinawan farmers used everyday tools in their defense. The millstone handle became the tonfa and the rice flail became the nunchaku. Are you able to see that you can apply the principle of what the Okinawans did to a pencil, a magazine, a book, an umbrella, etc and use in your defense?
  8. One principle, many techniques. Dig deeper for the principle so that your understanding of it can help you with many techniques. 


Hope this helps you to see deeply in your sojourn of septillion steps!

Thursday, June 21, 2018

Some of the Major Misconceptions or Fallacies of JKD by Badger Johnson



This essay is not designed to denigrate Jeet Kune Do (JKD), its standup skills, or various aspects which are quite valuable to learn, including short power, fast close footwork, trapping skills, and over-development of various muscle and core systems. It is an outline to provide practitioners a set of guidelines to help individuals to understand the system and even work on methods to deal with holes in the pure standup game.

A layered skill set involving good standing grappling, ground grappling, wrestling as base arts can definitely use JKD type principles added in support of those abilities. In addition to the normal methods, knowing various tie-ups, traps, wrist locks and short power moves are good ways to get from top control into a submission.

1. Almost all of the moves we have seen (movies, instructional) are stage fighting. Examples of this in the movie Enter the Dragon:

  • The fight with O’Hara, which is staged with both fighters starting hands back to back. Even though O’Hara knows he is outclassed he still goes back and puts his hand back against Lee’s.
  • The fight with multiple opponents who come one after another, very similar to the classic sword-fighter movies.
  • Bruce Lee has said to his students that he would not fight in a real combat situation as you see in the movies.
  • Many of the fights rely on camera angles and in truth Bruce Lee is not in position to hit multiple times with his triple kicks.
  • All of the other fights are done in an exciting style, not long and drawn out, but they are still cinematic in nature.

2. You can’t do JKD without Bruce Lee level attributes. In order to do interception you have to have high skill in non-intention attacks, and non-telegraphic movements. You must have an unbendable arm to do trapping and keep the opponent at that range. People who try to do JKD invariably set up in demo-mode, and are having the “attacker” feed them movements which allow trap-hits and pak-sao energy. In similarly skilled matches you will not see any JKD/Wing Chun (WC) type movements.

3. Trapping distance is an artificial construct. The actual techniques which are employed at this artificial range are moves such as wrestling single-collar tie-ups, boxing hooks to the head and body, or standing grappling rapidly occurs. It may be compelling to think simultaneous block-and-strike and trapping methods would work the distance quickly collapses or is subsumed by wrestling or throwing moves. Can a trap of a more general nature work, such as a grab and strike? Yes, but the notion of a flurry of WC trapping and tie-up is rare and trying to pick strikes out of the air (guarding gates) usually ends up with the attacker/defender reaching for a parry and they get hit with a flurry of hooks or uppercuts.

4. On the ground (ground fighting) striking is almost nullified. The typical kind of strikes you rely on in WC or JKD, straight punches, even short power, rely on a power chain that comes from ground path or the drop step or other type of power chain. Typically, if you can fight back, you are limited, sometimes to frantic elbow strikes from the bottom. From top control it’s still not simple to hit if the opponent can deflect or cover. Anyone who only has standup skill will find it greatly reduced in ground fighting. What you see in current UFC fighting in ground and pound is employed by people with wrestling skill backing that up allowing them to maintain top control.


You are not going to get anyone to start a fight as you see Lee and O’Hara use with hands touching.

5. Interception works primarily in one venue, the standing start confrontation. Someone with special skills in close combat, i.e. contact reflexes and short power, can do a lot of damage in a very short time frame in a special venue, that of standing start sudden confrontation. This is what Bruce Lee would have excelled at, since he could sense the opponent’s line of attack and use interception and short power and eye jabs and eye attack feints to quickly end the fight. You are not going to get anyone to start a fight as you see Lee and O’Hara use with hands touching. While it’s true Bruce Lee would often get the upper hand in demonstrations by rushing forward so he could get some contact and empty contact reflexes, this is hard to acquire in a real, unstructured fight.

6. Nobody has shown JKD in a dynamic match neither sparring fighting, nor demonstration. Without compliant stuntmen it can’t be sustained.

7. JKD ground work or throwing range was still in the ‘collection of tricks’ stage. Even years later when you see various of Bruce Lee’s students doing ground fighting it was a quick set of moves with a cooperating opponent, starting with an agreed upon start point such as a wrist grab or bear hug. They did not even show rolling or flowing using guard and mount in some of Dan Inosanto’s JKD grappling DVD instructional, even though by that time rolling was a known methodology. It was because he had not yet developed grappling flow, nor did he understand how to do BJJ or JKD with a BJJ flavor.

8. Bruce Lee did not have mobile kicking. Mobile kicking incorporates bridging the gap in one move. Mobile kicking invokes a sequence in which, from a fighting stance, the body is unweighted and the energy of chambering the lead leg pulls the body forward and the rear leg slides forward along the gap to be bridged and the kick is thrown with a high chamber immediately. It is not a 1-2-3 movement you see in step kicks. It’s sometimes seen with a hop but the back leg does not move first. This is seen primarily in early TKD kicking even as far back as the late 70s and early 80s. Against a mobile kicker, a static or step kicker has almost no chance of getting in a kick. You can see this in some of the backyard videos that Bruce Lee did with James Coburn.

9. Bruce Lee did not have any takedown skills, such as a penetration step, lowering the level and shooting, neither did he have a takedown defense. Though some people can use a knee or elbow or side-step against a takedown it is non-standard, requires takedown training to perfect, and thus without actual skill in wrestling it is usually very easy for grapplers and wrestlers to get a takedown against pure strikers. Since Bruce Lee did not have to regularly contend with wrestlers or grapplers, he realized he had to be very careful to stay out of range. However, wrestlers are very adept at getting under a jab or getting the opponent to step into their penetration step. It’s a definite weakness and a hole its the typical game of someone who trains in standup only.

10. None of Bruce Lee’s students have solved these problems, including Dan Inosanto, of the lack of aliveness, removing the scripted nature of ‘demo sparring’, nor did they seem to realize the need for hyper-development of attributes and strengths. Among the few in JKD who did strive to solve these problems were most notably, Matt Thornton/SBG and Erik Paulson and their students.

11. Though people have extracted some of the principles of JKD they are stuck in the ‘what’ and don’t have a conception about the ‘how’ to enable developing them.

12. In the late stage of JKD Bruce Lee was actively hiding his methods even from the inner circle. (See below the list of 25 most common things that Bruce Lee was hiding to prevent another from following in his path, since he was reluctant to give those who were bigger and stronger abilities similar to his.) He was OK with giving some of the surface moves or some of the derivational moves he uncovered, but he would be very careful about showing how he did various moves and the build up needed to do some of his stunts. If you don’t know how some of the stunt are developed over a long time with lots of methods of training and conditioning seeing the final stunt does not give you the means to duplicate it.

13. They did not routinely practice leg kicks at or near the level of MMA and MT. JKD kicks are done at the level of stop kicks and are at a good skill level but without consistent practice against a variety of strong opponents they will not be developed beyond a certain level. Certainly stop kicks and simultaneous block and kick methods are good against rudimentary kicking certain aspects found in MT and MMA do not get trained.


The ability to handle multiple opponents is actually just stage fighting.

14. The ability to handle multiple opponents is actually just stage fighting; it’s not reality based. Against even three people who work in concert and who have some experience it is very unlikely that any fighting method can work. It makes for exciting movie-making but is not realistic.

15. Bruce Lee had good infighting abilities but he had not developed certain aspects seen in modern boxing, such as side-stepping, staying in the pocket, the bob and weave, and the modern MMA peek-a-boo blocking cover reflexes. He was still espousing a distance parry and interception method which doesn’t work against capable opponents, even though he recognized that these Western boxing skill did exist. Being able to demonstrate them is not the same as using them against a skilled boxer.

16. His ground fighting skill methods were still in the mode of JJJ (Classical Japanese Jiu-Jitsu) or a collection of tricks. Though he may have been close to uncovering the idea of ‘aliveness’ many of his proponents didn’t figure it out for many, many years. Subsequent JKD students did realize that grappling was important, but they had not realized the method to do so, which is using BJJ, guard and mount and rolling as a delivery system to ‘aliveness’ which is movement, timing, resistance, lack of scripting,

17. Bruce Lee did not yet understand ‘aliveness’ or timing, movement, resisting opponent and he had not understood the delivery system needed to develop skills through rolling.

18. His biggest draw back was that he did not have a wide variety of opponents near his level to allow the best progression and almost all of his students and partners were well beneath his ability - no fault of his, to be sure.

19. One of his biggest problems, pointed out by Joe Lewis is his ‘untested chin’. Many gym fighters discover to their dismay when they actually fight that their abilities in the ring are not comparable, either due to lack of durability, glass jaw, or adrenaline dump or nerves.

20. Finally he had a very limited experience with actual sport-fighting, due, in part to a lack of venues for such things, so we don’t really have a good sense of his weaknesses and limitations. The key point is not these specifics but the great advances and methods he was using are still in use today.

Advanced methods of JKD still in use:

1. Bruce Lee had ‘next level’ capabilities in his lead hand finger jab, including shocking speed, penetration, timing and precision. In theory that weapon, coupled with 1” fa-jing like power, speed of initiation and ability to get in before being blocked it could handle any opponent regardless of size (but within reach) or weight. Could a boxer with lightweight speed and reflexes have blocked or evaded the eye jab? It’s unlikely.

2. Bruce Lee had next level ability to kick from a distance, using both sudden explosive ability and an ability to break free hanging boards. However, his kicking was not at the level of modern MT.

3. Few, if any successors really understand the non-intention (NI), non-telegraphic (NT) nature of Bruce Lee’s ability, excepting Pat Strong, and fewer still show comparable development.

4. Few, if any successors understand how Bruce Lee was able to intuit his opponent’s attack before it was begun. This is derived from his NI and NT ability, projected outward.


Bruce Lee’s ability to call up rage mode in a split second

5. Few, if any successors understand Bruce Lee’s ability to call up rage mode in a split second, how it was developed and implemented. A few people are aware of it (Bleecker, Lewis, DeMile).

6. Few, if any successors have understood nor developed his core, forearm, unbendable bridge arm, neck and back development. He was driven to make ‘weak aspects’ found in everyone over-developed, including the bridge arm, the finger jab, the fast close (which could have been improved).

7. There is generally an agreement from at least two sources, Jesse Glover and James DeMile primarily, that Bruce Lee was actively hiding his methods of development. We have some hints of ways he did things, and we know from some advanced students like Patrick Strong that there are some known developmental paths that he took. One of them was to break all techniques into three parts or phases. We also know he used isometrics and weight training, and he used various training devices that James Lee built, as well as traditional WC methods, like the Wooden Dummy. We know he emphasized training the waist, core, upper back, wrists and neck for specific reasons. He trained the waist and wrist to help him extend power away from the body, as he called it or short power. See below a partial list of some of the methods that Bruce Lee was actively hiding. These are ideas that I have put together over many years of studying writings, training, and trying to read between the lines and find various clues to flesh out these methods.

===

Among the things that Bruce Lee was hiding, I share the following. I have no way to  confirm these and I’d ask readers to evaluate my commentary and use these ideas to point the way to their own research.

Here is a list of many of the main things that I believe we have evidence that Bruce Lee was keeping more-or-less secret:

1) How he developed his 'non-intention' methods, both how he knew that non-intention was different from 'non-telegraphic’, and what was needed to exhibit non-intention based preparations.

2) The training methodology for doing the fast close from 3 and 5 feet has not been disclosed. Jesse Glover details how he talked to him about breaking any technique down into three parts. He also subdivided the types of speed into several categories. Initiation speed, mile per hour speed, timing speed and speed in combinations. Today we know there are methods to develop the ability a sprinter has for coming out of the blocks, for instantly reacting to a stimulus. These include certain types of over-speed training, being pulled forward with elastic bands and so forth.


Some people have mentioned that the source for JKD were 26 arts that Bruce Lee studied or favored.

3) Some people have mentioned that the source for JKD were 26 arts that Bruce Lee studied or favored. This is somewhat speculative since Bruce Lee did not create this list but some students have claimed he told them. In other words the reason he chose to detail these 26 arts has been explained in a way that is really incomplete. There was a specific reason, but he didn't articulate it. I think it’s safe to say, that in addition to having some familiarity with these known styles, he wanted an art to represent each of the ranges of combat. Close fighting, medium range, kicking range, fencing range, ground-fighting range and so on.

4) Some things were hidden in plain sight. They were hidden behind aphorisms. It takes some deep thought and digging around to really understand what they actually meant. He talked about the cutting away non-essential things (like a sculptor removing clay), however, if you didn’t have deep understanding of things there was nothing left to be removed. We know Guro Dan has talked about various phrases, such as ‘Absorb What is Useful’, but we don’t actually know the origin of these phrases. They key is to examine these commonly repeated concepts and be sure to know the why of them, and the how of them. How is something accomplished is more important in deep understanding than knowing what the phrase or proverb was.

5) The method of development and the reason for developing his bridge arm is not widely discussed. We now know he relied heavily on isometrics, and Jesse Glover related that Bruce Lee talked about how he used to press his arm against the underside of his desk in school because he was bored. One day his hand slipped off of the desk and he was surprised at the way energy was suddenly released. This concept formed the basis for some of his fast attack movements.

6) The methodology behind being able to 'read' an opponent's intention is not well explained. At this point only one of his students talks about it (Pat Strong). Part of this was being able to go into a mode similar to that kind of perception where things seem to slow down. Various sports experts talk about how they perceive the game ball to move slowly, to be much larger than normal and to feel they had a lot of time to react, far beyond the mere micro-seconds that went by in real time. Ted Williams talked about being able to see the seams in a fast ball. Jimmy Connors said that he perceived the tennis ball in a fast serve to actually be larger than reality. It’s not quite clear what the brain mechanism is that accounts for this. Some people seem to have a knack for calling it up spontaneously. There may have been a procedure that Bruce Lee used to develop ‘fast perception’ and perhaps how to get into the state where time seemed to expand. Since it’s not an uncommon phenomenon, it is worth exploring.


Bruce Lee's highly developed forearms

7) We know Bruce Lee had a reason for his developing his forearms to such a high degree, but there are few discussions on why. Though people might quibble with this, bear in mind only one or two JKD practitioners worked on things like this. If people wanted to do JKD and omit this that shows they don't understand what the importance was. Obviously, it takes genetics, and a lot of time and energy to develop these kinds of attributes, many of which are beyond those of the normal trainer. Part of the ability of hitting hard is having a very tight fist - there is no give in the hand. In addition the closing of the hand and the classic ‘wrist tilt’ which occurs in a vertical punch is magnified if there is hyper-development of those muscles.



Bruce Lee developing core and abdominals

8) We know there are obvious reason why someone wants to develop their core and abdominals. It’s fairly obvious that if the opponent does not have this kind of development then they may be unable to use some of the methods of accumulating power and issuing energy. He went to such extremes because of his idea of making weak things strong, things that were weak even in strong individuals.  Only a few people who claim to be JKD or JDK concepts students or instructors did that, and almost none of this other inner circle did. Without an ability to tie the upper and lower parts of the body together you can’t stabilize various high speed movements and you can’t transmit power from the ground and the legs to the arms and hands. We know that types of fa-jing (Chinese internal power) require a type of store and release involving the pelvic floor muscles and the internal core muscles.

9) Though we now know about the existence of various training tools and equipment, there’s some doubt that his second and third group of students were not exposed to the use of training equipment, particularly some of the things that James Lee build for him. I wonder if his students even knew he was using that equipment. Yes, there are pictures of him using various things but he did not, to my knowledge, go over those in depth when he was teaching in the early 70s.

10) He hid his 'x-rated' moves. He discussed those with Dan and Jesse and we have some inkling that he would not fight in a real life-or-death situation like we see in the movies or any of his media or comments. By ‘X-rated’ a term he shared with Jesse Glover, he meant deadly force, not just hitting but one-strike kills or one movement kills such as neck wrenches hitting the area near the heart, or using eye attacks. An equivalent method would be a single-strike incapacitating move.

11) Bruce Lee had an extensive number of supplements and vitamins and other substances, including prescription items that he used. We do not really know completely what he used and what his dosage level was. Even if we largely discount much of what Tom Bleecker says in his book “Unsettled Matters”, nobody really knows what he was doing as far as diet and supplementation. In order to try and duplicate such things it would be helpful to know what Bruce Lee used to develop such a high degree of muscularity and low subcutaneous fat. There are regimes we know of now, but it’s possible that this was not natural. When one looks at photographs of Bruce Lee in his mid-twenties he had a normal athletic build, but it is not on par with the extreme muscularity and low subcutaneous fat.

We do know he had friends and associates who could acquire performance-enhancing substances, and there are stories of unusual dietary practices he engaged in. There are no clear diary records which have been released which describe his supplement and medication dosages. We do know he had prescriptions for cortico steroids.

12) He hid his true level of sparring ability. We hear he never sparred except for brief demonstrations when training Joe, Chuck or Mike Stone. Some have suggested it could be because he didn’t want anyone to know how good he was, or perhaps what weaknesses he had. If one examines the large number of sparring and fighting principles he left behind, including those specific ones that Joe Lewis details in his books, it’s clear that he was espousing methods that far advanced beyond what most people were using in those days. We have to remember the majority of karate instructors, when asked, would say things like ‘do more kata’ or work harder. He was one of the first people to systematize the use of weights and specific resistance machines.

13) He carefully shielded all of his pro-level students from sharing what he was telling them. Both Joe Lewis, Mike Stone and Chuck Norris and other pro-level students he worked with said that he always kept their training separate.

14) He hid the double pak-sao. He specifically told Dan never to disclose that. One has to realize that what he meant by this move is probably not the same as the typical WC version. Perhaps hit was an over-trained method.


It's said that Bruce Lee could penetrate an old style coke can holding the can in his hand with a finger stab.

15) The degree of his ability as to his finger jab was not often talked about except in years after he had passed away. There are 'stories' that he could penetrate an old style coke can holding the can in his hand with a finger stab.

16) He hid the nature of his EDC (everyday carry). Some stories are out there that he carried nunchaku and some that he was occasionally armed with a firearm.


Bruce Lee hid the power of his back fist.

17) He hid the power of his back fist. There are stories in the last year of his life he was able to dent the face mask of their sparring masks with a back fist and that this mask was of above average gauge steel mesh, almost a grid not a mesh.

18) He hid his ability to ‘take a punch’, and by that I mean a punch to the face/head. There’s some speculation that he may have had a good chin and some that he may have had a glass jaw and didn’t dare spar lest that be exposed. There are other indications in direct opposition to this, in that he trained his neck and jaw muscles which are known to help resist being knocked out.

19) He hid some of his conclusions about the efficacy of JKD and we see some of this in his letters to other Yip Man students particularly Hawkins Cheung (HC) which he discussed it privately which have now been published. He talked to HC about how he felt that JDK was ultimately a failure, though he didn’t explain what that meant except to say he could not make ‘interception’ work in all cases.

20) He hid some of his extensive training notes, though later some of that came out when Linda Lee and Gilbert L. Johnson compiled and published them in The Tao of JKD. It’s possible he didn’t share much of this with any of his students. We tend to think of these things as ‘not hidden’ because Linda and Gilbert published the notes, but the truth is, I don’t think Bruce Lee had any intention of letting much if not most of this out to his students, much less the public. Much of what was put together in The Tao of JKD were obvious cribs of various boxing manuals, fencing manuals and quotes taken from Jiddu Krishnamurti, a noted philosopher.


This acrobatic stunt was performed by Yuen Wah and not Bruce Lee.

21) The fact that the stunt men in his movies were the ones doing the more acrobatic things and not him was not forthcoming until much later. In fact, to this day it’s not common knowledge that all the aerial acrobatics in Enter the Dragon were performed by a stunt man (and he had his own team of stuntmen), and not him that stunt was actually done by Yuen Wah. Bruce Lee did not have any unusual tumbling or aerial aerobatic skills.

22) He hid his physical flaws, inducing his leg length discrepancy and his vision problems, though now we know about those.

23) He hid how he developed his ‘kill word’ or his ‘instant ramp up to killing intent’ (James DeMile explains it involves self-hypnosis and using a ‘pre-programmed kill word’ that you say silently).


The Chinese audience called Bruce Lee ‘the man with three legs’.

24) He showed the public a side which was a bit different than his real abilities. We all thought he was a super kicker, and the Chinese audience called him a name something like ‘the man with three legs’ for his triple turning kick. But we all found out later his real power was in his hands.

25) He presented a stage image of a ‘fighter’ using essentially sparring techniques which were really equivalent to ‘stage fighting’ like you see in the old Douglas Fairbanks sword and swashbuckling movies. The reality is that he told Dan ‘a real fight now will be over in about 3 seconds, I don’t play around’.

© Badger Johnson 2018




Please check out Badger Johnson's other essays:

Thursday, February 12, 2015

Addendum, Clarification and Expansion of Paul Vunak's Fighting Secrets by Badger Johnson



My friend Badger Johnson wrote up this essay after reading:






With Badger's kind permission, I'm posting his essay to my site. Truly hope this helps you in your Sojourn of Septillion Steps!


Good luck in your training!








"Addendum, Clarification and Expansion of Paul Vunak's Fighting Secrets"



Author’s Note: This is an essay designed to look constructively into Vu’s list of fighting secrets. It’s essentially a deconstruction and is not an attempt to be dismissive or disrespectful of his work.  If you print out his list and refer to it while reading this it will be clearer.



1. Stress Inoculation – “I used riding my bike wearing plastic/rubber lined rain gear in 95 degree weather for three years. Now that's some stress inoculation and it’s consistently and easily repeatable. The key though, is to do the right kind and to not go past the point where it is causing injury or creating excess cortisol. But it takes a long time (weeks of consistent practice) to get an effect.


2. SI stand up – “Learning to take a punch with your eyes open - not closing your eyes when about to be hit. This is done by using headgear and goggles and doing a slow progression to boxing gloves. In reality you shield your eyes so there's no 'eye contact' but that's not what you're doing. You're trying to remove the 'blink reflex'.”


3. Accordion drill – “I don't believe Vu and his students actually did this, or did it very infrequently, for various reasons. It's not based on 'aliveness' and it has artificiality about it. To learn ranges, you train that range, you train transitions. Also, you go to an expert and immerse yourself in his range. I.e. don't do 'anti-grappling' with a non-grappler. Keep in mind that complex drills are often counter-productive, being substituted for actual sparring.”


4. Takedown Defense - "This is also an example of 'mental defense' in that it is not something you can reliably practice, it is not a drill that you can find a partner to help you practice, either the groin kick or the biting. So it can't be functionalize. The real way to learn takedown defense - see the UFC - is to learn how wrestlers do it, learn to sprawl, learn to do BJJ with an actual instructor. Relying on extreme moves is fine until someone who is really skilled figures this out. They will have positional dominance on you and be much better at doing this. You must have positional dominance either from top control or bottom control (skill and leverage) before you can employ 'extreme measures'."


5. Favorite Takedown - "There are many ways to safely throw an unskilled opponent and if you do practice judo you will find it easy to do. Pulling guard is OK, if you have skills workable off your back. Otherwise it is not something I'd promote in a 'fight' with a stranger. Trips, sweeps, and just plain man-handling someone who is not aware of balance attacks works better. Again, he's trying to give out 'secrets that someone can 'read' about and use. This whole idea is dubious"


6. Straight Blast - "High attribute-based move. Can your 25 year old athletic daughter use this? Can your wife use it? Possibly, they might, given some training. In addition there's a hidden problem with doing a straight blast and that is most people are good with going forward with a shuffle, like a fencer, one side forward. It takes a fair amount of training to do that 'walking step' you see in KK (Krabi Krabong), where the left foot steps forward, unlike the sliding advance you see in boxing and fencing. It's not clear why people want to put that one side forward, and few of the SB guys will talk about the walking step, in fact in some of Vu's videos he uses it but his student's don't."
  

7. Pendulum - "Not a bad concept - hard to train with a partner, too easy to be lulled by cooperation. Not everyone can bring themselves to blind or neuter someone. By the time you realize the fight is to the death you've already forgotten technique. Same thing is true with biting. We have mental barriers to doing things like that. You're not going to be able to train your daughter or wife to bite off someone's nose and rip off a testicle. In fact many women have trouble giving themselves permission to hit someone. One thing to remember is that these tips have to work for people who really need them. Telling a 250lb 6'5 guy about how to groin kick or eye gouge is kind of silly. He can just about do anything and end most fights. It's the small, frail, female or elderly person, the child who we must imagine using SD ideas and at least try to adapt things for that kind of person. Yes training of some kind is required, but think 'can it be trained with a partner', can it be functionalized under stress and is it reasonable? If a person tries to grab your purse, you are not going to want to blind them (though some might)."


8. Secret of Interception - "As I said in a recent post the secret of broken rhythm is not 'you' breaking your rhythm it's you picking up and breaking your opponent's rhythm. Here Vu talks about how BL (Bruce Lee) would entice someone to move forward then suddenly intercept. However that aside, WHERE are these videos of BL sparring and doing this. WHY hasn't Vu put them on CD or DVD and become an instant millionaire? Nobody I know or have read about has ever suggested there are any videos or tapes or anything where BL is sparring and he doesn't use this 'piking' or shrimping movement sparring with Dan at the Internationals. I'm not saying Vu is making this up, because it makes sense. I'm just wondering where this footage is"


9. Defanging – “Angle #2 is a backhand strike. Though it might subtend a favorable angle it will undoubtedly be a slower strike, depending on the tool used. Of course the 'flick' using the rotation of the wrist can be a very fast strike. I do remember my 'ah-ha' moment when I realized that using the concept of range it was easier to hit the hand (distance wise) than to hit the opponent's head or body But at the same time, the hand is moving around. In DB fights you see people swipe at the hand and miss. So the key here is how to make the opponent put their hand in range and keep it there for you to hit. The answer is by ABD (Attack by Drawing). You lure their hand into range moving slowly and then defang. So though Vu talks about 'what' he doesn't mention the 'how'."


10. Isometrics the Secret to the Guard - "Localized muscular endurance. This is one of about four types of energy that you learn to train and can train by doing your sport. In addition the secret to maintaining guard and bottom control is not constant muscular tension, it's learning efficient control while being relaxed. I guarantee you Rickson (or any good blue belt in BJJ) is not grabbing on and holding on for dear life when he traps and controls you from guard."


11. One inch punch – “Vu talks about his 'demo punch' but that is different than his fighting 'one inch punch'. See where James DeMile talks about this. In addition the cultivation of 'short power' is worth doing. I've talked about it and it emanates from the waist and the wrist. Find ways to train 'short power' from everywhere and do them all. From breaking to punching to hitting a makiwara to hitting paper and punching at candle flames and punching coffee cans across a picnic table and finger spearing watermelons. Over time all your lead punches and your hooks will have added power. Primarily, though what you need to train is your forearm, your grip and your finger strength. It goes along with BL's idea to train to make things that are weak even in strong people strong. His bridge arm and his forearms."


12. Super Coordination ! - "I don't buy this as a way to make trapping or other complex high attribute things work. We know from the videos that Roy Harris does that there are ways to functionalize trapping and they are technical. Once again Vu is saying 'spar a lot with a guy who will do this with you and finding a guy who can do that - good luck'. I think high level, high attribute stuff happens, partly because the person has a knack. Not everyone is going to have this coordination and some things you just can't teach. I've had students who I knew were never going to be coordinated and I know myself there are some things I am never going to be super good at, given the time at hand. For example a professional style tennis serve or a college level high dive twisting somersault is going to be out of most people’s reach. Keep it real."


13. Flashlight principle “This sounds good. Quite frequently, if you give someone
a special perspective in sparring they can end up beating  their opponent. It doesn't have to be limited to 'flashlighting' their weapons hand. So take this principle and broaden it.


14. Mother of All Drills - "While I would agree with the three criteria, realistic, alive and mode, I don't believe he actually does this. I think it's one of those imaginary ideas. You can simulate all this stuff in the studio, mats, training blades, eye protection because as Jigoro Kano said the method of training trumps dangerous moves. Should you seek to employ things like distractions, noise, darkness, and obstacles. Sure, but I'd do them one at a time. Too much chaos and we don't learn."


15. The U drill - "This is a corollary to my thesis that the best and only way to train with the knife is to use 'alive' methods. That is to start out with double wrist control and top control (then later bottom control with full guard and double wrist control. Once you have done this and learned how to deal you can move on. The idea of learning fighting or grappling with the blade from the non-contact range is ludicrous. It just doesn't happen. Now you might be able to move from the contract range, learning contact reflexes like Vu says to the 'gap range' but not de novo."


16. How To Double Your speed !  - "Though I tend to agree with his description we now know there are other ways to train the nervous system to improve speed. I would agree that there are many types of speed and he covers that part well. Initiation speed, speed of combinations, reaction speed and performance speed are among the many types. There's also 'speed of thought' (fast eyes) and timing speed (speed of change or flow). I would often use elastic bands or springs rather than weights. And I would train the whole body, not just an arm or leg. You can improve your running speed, (leg turnover) by running a slight downhill. You can improve your movement speed by training under water (just your body). You can improve your 'eye speed' by understanding complex moves. For example I did not understand nor could I follow soccer until I played it a little and knew the rules. By being able to structure the sport I improved my 'eye speed' mostly by knowing where to look and what to look for."


17. Kettlebell – “I completely agree with this one, but will expand on it. The kettlebell overhead snatch is working what I call the posterior chain muscles. Those are the glutes, hamstrings and spinal erectors. These muscles are used in jumping, long jumping and high jumping. The exercise cited can also be done with a dumbbell, and is called 'the goblet squat', which is a little less intense and can be used as a precursor. Many people who tout the squat as the king of exercises do it in such a way as to almost eliminate the posterior chain and focus instead on the quads maybe upper back and calves. By putting the bar behind the neck the vector is shifted away from the posterior chain. Thus front squats, goblet squats and the OH squat are superior athletically. You can do overhead squats just using a wooden dowel about 1" thick normally used to hang clothes in a closet. The resistance or weight is inconsequential while you develop form. Later you can move to just an Olympic bar (45lbs) and then much later start adding weight, but again even advanced players don't need a lot of weight."


18. What Makes Us Different? - "Totally agree here, and the only way to expand is to recite the tenets of 'Alive' training. Finishing moves are useless if you don't know the flow, the method of training and the positional dominance. Thus Gene Lebell's book on finishing moves is totally worthless as a training manual since it doesn’t show sequence or training methods, while Eddie Bravo's book showing the tree behind the moves (JuJitsu UnleashedMastering the Rubber Guard, etc) do have the footwork, the timing and the progression. It's actually more than the drills but the development of 'the flow' in various areas. There's striking flow, grappling flow and takedown flow."


19. The Power of the Fork - “Agree with this but the concept needs to be broadened. I call it attack on multilple fronts. One uses the fork not just for human enemies but for internal and external problems of all kinds. Attack on multiple fronts and don't meet the enemy (ideological or physical) force-on-force and a weaker force can defeat a stronger but un-united force.”
           

20. The Double Progressive Indirect attack - "Here the question should be, 'why can't people who know how to punch in combination, or how to do PIA pull it off in a fight'. That's the key to this and it all comes down to broken rhythm. This is timing or perceiving your opponents rhythm and then breaking it. The other question is 'how do effectively do a fake'. It's not easy, because too broad a fake and the opponent is not fooled. The fake must be subtle and indistinguishable from a real technique. We fake with the hip, the shoulder and the head primarily. So to make this key concept work, we have to understand more about how hard it is to punch in combination and how to fake effectively."
           

21. Locking the Art of Joint Reversals - "Here, Vu gets it right in a sense, but there is more to it. One can get a lock out of a 'catch' a scoop, a parry and a 'stop' (shooting your hand to the shoulder of the opponent and stopping his punch before it gains speed.) But you must also pay attention to unbalancing your opponent and some angulation footwork. Too often you see RBSD (Reality-Based Self-Defense) guys doing moves against a single arm or punch or something but they are doing it statically, not dynamically. That means they are not disrupting the opponent's balance they are not driving forward or using forward pressure. Now, I know Vu knows this he just failed to elucidate it here. Destructions are one type of 'stop' but to be clear you can't just throw a destruction - it has to 'stop' the punch first. Otherwise the punch may still connect even if it causes less damage. Catch the punch and simultaneously bring down the elbow to the back of the hand, or stab the bicep. Here you've stopped it and at the same time applied the destruction which weakens the technique. You can use stops and destructions in other areas, leg, takedown defense etc. You can also use this in the mental game. You can interrupt and stop and destruct the opponent's will to fight. Much better than a physical joint lock. Now in addition a joint lock is a means to an end. You must neutralize the opponent also which usually means taking them to the ground. Don't just 'joint lock' and stand there. Maintain the body contact ahd take to the ground to finish the move."


22. Footwork - "Few people really understand footwork and how to do it. I don't think it's something you set out to learn by itself, but you learn it as a way to keep moving and doing what you do. We do learn some 'footwork' in tennis, but what really teaches us is following and trying to return the ball. We do learn footwork in basketball, but really, talented players come up with their own footwork to make that basket and run circles around the other player. Watch a playground basketball game. Do you really think any of those guys studied basketball footwork? The only footwork worth studying independently is the fencing lunge and the KK walking step. All the other stuff is to be learned on the fly. I might make a further exception and say certain footwork involved in learning to bob and weave in boxing should be learned, because they've worked out a pretty good system for it. But as Vu said, if you learn it by dancing, you will learn by imitation because you 'want to move like that' to follow the beat. It's more instinctive and instructive when music is involved and I've always said if a MA is not a good dancer he will not be a good MA."
           

23. The Nut Cracker - "This is, again, what I think is an 'imaginary drill' (which doesn’t make it bad) and people do not practice this regularly because it is high chaos and low learning. One must realize that nobody can adequately train to defend against an ambush, unless that person is being ambushed every day. For example someone who is a street cop is constantly being ambushed. By that I mean hit from all sides with surprises. They learn street smarts and gain experience so that in time, if they survive it is hard to 'ambush' them. Note that I'm not limiting it to a fighting drill or even physical confrontation. It's more a mental thing, dealing with surprise. Though there are hundreds of grappling moves, in the end the accomplished grappler doesn't have to learn an individual response to each of them (though they might to a degree). They learn to improvise and flow and feel or sense what's about to happen. So while it's good to show that a 'takedown' can occur from any direction, nobody is going to be any better at surviving it by doing this 'imaginary' but creative drill than they will by doing football or tackles or normal wrestling. And most people since they are not doing this drill every day will continue to be surprised and be taken down badly from an ambush. It's a fact of life that in general, if you're ambushed (particularly with a weapon) you lose. The key here is to learn how not to be surprised by 'not being there'."
           

24. The Missile – “I would agree that this might be a fun drill. I'm not convinced that they actually practiced this either but the key here is learning how stereoscopic vision and depth perception works. When a fencer or boxer or bowie knife fighter throws their jab, they want it to be straight at the opponent's eyes so that the opponent can't use depth perception. It has to look like it's coming right out from the shoulder as a two-dimensional thing. This prevents timing it or seeing the build up so it's hard to avoid. James Keating talks about this for Bowie on Legacy of Steel. Though again, I think this drill shows good imagination and is clever in the way it would potentially make the straight line strikes be non-telegraphic I don't believe any boxers really do this type of training, and it would probably be easy to side step and counter."
           

25. Contemporary JKD’s Progression - "All I will say here is that the straight blast is a function of the footwork. Watch Vitor Belfort's feet. Then watch Benjamin Rittiner do the KK footwork. They both do it the same way. The key is in the walking step or bringing that left foot forward and not using a fencer's or a boxers, same side foot forward shuffle. This walking step provides the needed forward pressure and unbalancing to allow the Straight blast to work. Paul probably knows this since he's presumable studied KK, but he sort of failed to mention it. His students don’t do it and he does it inconsistently, mostly using the shuffle. The shuffle does not provide the necessary forward pressure."
           

26. Body Mechanics - "Here we see the finishing move but we hear very little about what the body mechanics are. You could give a bunch of FMA guys bladed weapons and they wouldn't hit on the right method of training body mechanics. John LaCoste did have that ability to fight inside with that twisting, bending of the knees and sliding. But we can't just watch him and try to duplicate that. There is probably a method to developing that but Vu is not telling us, if he knows. Many people have tried to duplicate LaCoste's moves and failed. The other thing about training with blades is that there is a specific progression, which even the best FMA knife guys don't seem to know. So go through this progression, incorporate 'pressure' and learn through this how to fight inside. Is it possible to learn? I don't know, especially against another person who is armed."
           

27. Secret to Keeping Students - "I will remind the reader what the combination of factors were, which resulted in the most intense training of my life. That was downhill skiing with headphones on. It incorporated exhaustion, music and danger. I literally risked my life driving through several blizzards and epic snowfalls to get to the slopes to repeat this experience and after it was over it stuck with me for the rest of the day as pure joy. So if you can do downhill skiing on at least intermediate slopes on 180 cm skis, then drop all training and do that instead, in season. It will give your training new meaning. We don’t always know what will keep students involved, but at some point, the evolving student will need to move on.”
           

28. Quieting the Mind - "I will have to admit that the practice of doing thousands of these two exercises, of which I am familiar, and being a fan of the Great Gama, I did not know they were a type of moving meditation. It’s a worthy experiment. I will also submit that long distance swimming, cycling and running will accomplish a similar thing, though with these bodyweight exercises, these is no overhead for equipment. I suppose it is a matter of temperament as to whether you can get into this type of thing, but I will agree that Vu's friend is speaking truth. For me, though it took a while and required some skill the most trance-like state I encountered was when swimming a mile in a lap pool. I think it's something like 52 lengths in a 25-meter Olympic pool and I remember how hypnotic it was to see the droplets of water sparkling in the sun, when I turned my head to breathe. In addition to the repetitive nature, swimming requires a certain amount of breath control and we know from yoga and meditation practices that breath control is a key factor. With swimming it happens and is not a result of consciously breathing a certain way. You breath to live and keep swimming in other words."

           
29. The Great Eight - “This is interesting and I can see the validity here. But one must be sure to keep 'forward pressure' in all of these drills. All too often you see people doing them and kind of drifting off and standing completely still. This will not work or be effective. You must be moving around (eventually, at least, once you learn the static drill combinations and get the flow down) and begin creating resistance and flow not only in the limbs, but in the body and footwork.”
           

30. First Minute of the Fight - "Here Vu talks about 'structuring the opponent' which is a concept I came up with in 1979 and refined in 1983. If, you can sense what type of fighter someone is you can structure them and apply your strongest range against his weakest. It's more about using range though than using a particular technique (jab and kick). The hardest opponent to do this to is one where his range is in very close. It's almost impossible to keep a determined opponent at distance using strikes. Your best bet if you see the wrestling stance and the cauliflowered ears is to offer to buy him a beer."


36. Rickson - "Vu has detailed four of the things that Rickson Gracie can do but he's missed one of the greatest. I believe that Rickson is what we call dyslexic in the physical sense. IOW, he can see in three dimensions in his head. Dyslexics are able to rotate letters and words in their mind such that it works against them to a degree when trying to read. Well consider a person who can rotate their body and their opponent's body instantaneously in real time in their head. They can 'make up' on the fly various grappling moves, submissions and flow accordingly. They can anticipate, bait and intercept the opponent's next move and because of this appear to slow down time. That's why Rickson can move slowly. He is unlikely to be caught in something. He does not need to study the various side chokes, anaconda, darce, peruvian necktie, reverse triangle, he can see them and do them on the fly. Of course this ability might be a fluke, because I don't know how you train it. By 'base' Vu means positional dominance and balance. It's very hard if not impossible to sweep Rickson if he doesn't want to be swept. (reversed)."



Thanks for reading. I have not covered the last 13 items because I don’t see an opportunity to add anything. Hope this is helpful to your training. It’s always important to deconstruct what we’re taught and to seek better methods when possible. The unexamined dogma is a missed opportunity. Seek your own truths.

BAJ - 2015



Please check out Badger Johnson's other essays:



Please leave a Comment of some feedback for Badger below.


Friday, December 06, 2013

James W. DeMile - Intuitive Speed



In response to a question about Bruce speed

INTUITIVE SPEED

Bruce Lee felt it was critical to have sufficient distance between you and a potential aggressor so you could read his movement.


Intuitive speed is pure feeling. It is a feeling that something is about to happen. It is the seed of motion. It is the ability to know that the person is energizing or has made some sort of subconscious decision to make an action. This exercise is practiced in a stationary position so that you see the change of the body when he goes to do something. When the opponent is moving around, it is much more difficult to determine whether his forward bounce is an attack or a draw or an alive position.


If you are serious about getting good in your skill then you need to spend time working on both the intuitive speed and the ability to read setting-up for motion. Setting-up for motion means that the person is placing himself into a second position where he can kick or launch a hand strike. The opponent is doing something to give himself a base to go into his technique. This is not how you develop your intuitive sense because with reading motion, you are looking for a marked position.. In the intuitive sense, you are looking for the beginning of the action where it is based on the energy to move coming from the opponent. The intuitive speed is a feeling where you are trying to identify the source or the beginning of the action, whether it is energy or physical.


Intuitive speed is motion that is triggered by some psychological awareness that the opponent is just starting his attack or move. It is an awareness that something is about to move like a light is about to come on or something is about to fall but your mind is so sensitive that it knows when it is going to happen. It does not know that it is going to happen from a minute from now but it knows that it is about to start.


It is starting where the actual neurological connections are already to start to connect but it is just that the body has not moved yet. But by some strange reason you pick it up. This is the only possible way to explain Bruce Lee's reaction time. He had intuitive speed. Inuitive speed paired together with the startled reaction will build quite a combination and makes you unbelievably fast.


If you see somebody move and you move as a result of that motion then you are already behind that motion because he has already moved first. You might be fairly fast and maybe even block that strike. If the person starts to move and even before he can move where he is just starting his motion,you are aware of his intent and you are already hitting him. How do you do that? You must have in some way know that he was going to move in order to cover that distance. You not only needed to react where psychologically you knew it but you also needed for your body to react. You would have to have speed that would allow you to get there. The only thing that will allow the speed to get there is a startled reaction which is the fuel for motion.


We practiced the intuitive speed by a few different exercises. The quick draw, TV meditation,clapping drill and by sitting and watching students practice and see if we could identify when and how they were going to move, before they moved.


There were nine different elements of speed and this was only one of them.





Posted to Facebook Oct 5, 2013

You can contact Sijo James W. DeMile via his Wing Chun do Site or Facebook.


Please check out these other articles by Sijo DeMile:



Thursday, December 05, 2013

James W. DeMile - Why Train Chi Sao?



WHY TRAIN IN CHI SAO

In classical Wing Chun teaching of Trapping, Chi Sao and Phon Sao were the same thing and it took many years to develop a defined skill. There was no distinction between the two, they were one art. Which in China, was OK, because training was a way of life and one would devote many years to develop even a basic skill.

At 18, Bruce Lee was still a student, not a teacher and wanted to continue his training in Wing Chun. He became frustrated after arriving in America, because there were no masters to train under. So, he decided to train training partners. This decision created two major problems. First, Chinese was his first language and it was hard to give English definitions to Chinese concepts. Second, since he was still just a student and learning trapping himself, he found it extremely difficult to communicate the innumerable option of motion without totally confusing his students. He solved both problems by simplifying the process of teaching Trapping by reducing the information into two distinctly separate levels, Chi Sao (an exercise) and Phon Sao (the application)

I have read, over the years, that Bruce Lee said that Chi Sao was not necessary to learn, that Trapping skills could be developed without it. Easily said, since Bruce already knew Chi Sao and its relationship to Trapping. It is like a millionaire telling you that money is not really important. Let me share my thoughts on reflecting what Bruce told me in my early years of training with him.

Bruce said it would be like trying to run before you can walk or trying to solve math problems before you can count. Phon Sao is totally spontaneous and relative to responding to the non-structured actions and reactions of your opponent. In application, it requires an extreme high level of skill in reading and controlling your opponents motion. You can use your hands, wrist or arms and there is no set starting position. You can attack or absorb an attack or do both. Although, there are people who have a natural talent for learning Trapping, most do not and I mean 98% of the population.

This is why Chi Sao is a critical step to evolving spontaneous trapping skills. Chi Sao is only an exercise and teaches you to walk or count. It allows students of different sizes and strengths to become equal. Chi Sao establishes physical guidelines of motion that are very efficient and effective, both offensively and defensively. But most important, it offers a set procedure to learn how to control the opponents actions and reactions within a defined area. This area is known as the Upper/Outer perimeter, where most attacks occur. This set procedure defines the stance (for stability/mobility and natural spring load base), centerline foundation ( for creating and maintaining two weapons), basic arm and hand positions (for natural defense), the rotation procedure (for defining the range of motion), blending (which enables the student to train any student, regardless of size) and attack options (creating and/or filling the holes of the opponent). By having a set procedure it allows the student to repeat, repeat, repeat his moves until he has a clear understanding of all the basic concepts of trapping.

Quite different, Phon Sao does not have a specific or required engagement structure. You can engage with your hands/wrist/arms in any manner allowing you to contact and control your opponent. The type of contact will determine the degree of Trap. Three defined methods of traps. Minor is checking. Closing of one angle with (three escape potentials). Major is closing three angles with (one escape potential ).
Maximum is restricting all angles (no escape potential).

Unlike Chi Sao, which you can do for an hour, Phon Sao is done in quick, short bursts of one to three moves. The majority of Phon Sao moves are done in less than 5 seconds. The types of actions and reactions will be different with each student and dependent on many factors, a few of which are, methods of engagement, amount of opposing energy, angles of energy, single or multiple energy, positive/negative energy flow, speed of motion and positions relative to the centerline. It is almost impossible for the teacher to teach a proper response when the student is reacting only to the “moment”. What might be the proper response of the teacher may not be the best response for the student. This is why a foundation is necessary so the teacher and student have a common language to explore the different potential for each encounter.

Addition, Division and multiplication are all applied aspects of numbers, but you first must be able to count the numbers from one to ten. The same logic is applied in Trapping. Chi Sao is learning to count from one to ten . Phon Sao is all the applied, from addition to Quantum Physics.




Posted to Facebook Sep 6, 2013

You can contact Sijo James W. DeMile via his Wing Chun do Site or Facebook.


Please check out these other articles by Sijo DeMile:



ShareThis

 
back to top
Stickgrappler's Sojourn of Septillion Steps